investing
Millionaires - Myths and Misconceptions
For the last two post, we have been talking and sharing lot about Millionaires and their mindset. Particualy in the previous post, I listed few questions which was asked by my friends and even asked myself many times. So I wanted to dwelve into those questions and crack some myths and misconceptions about Millionaires from research/study.
Let's start with something simple.
#1.
I have to become a millionaire/rich person to live happily.
That is not true but many think that way. If you ask me, that's a misconception by many people. It became ingrained in many people minds after looking at rich people, that they can live happily once they become a millionaire/billionaire or rich person.
One person's success in life shouldn't be all about money and how much he/she makes. It is just a part of the puzzle. It is mostly about how you live with what you make and how you help others to get what they want.Studies have for years shown that cash has only a small effect on our well being. One can still lead a miserable even after getting a windfall of money and there are many examples to prove that case.
#2. Millionaires are lavish spenders.
That's totally wrong. If you take Mr.Warren Buffet, he is one among the richest people in the world but he still lives in his old house. He drives his own car which is pretty old too. There are many other rich who lead a conservative and frugal life. Many new millionaires are true frugalers and made to the list by saving and conscious spending. Not everyone makes to millionaire list by winning a lottery. You should check out the book, frugal millionaires(http://www.thefrugalmillionaires.com) and you will understand how millionaires think differently than normal person.
#3. I will be financially free when I become a Millionaire.
Don't count on it not in this current economic situation and expected high inflated one in the future. These days, simply being a (one) millionaire is not enough to be financially free, depending on ones age. Financial freedom is totally independent of being rich person. Not all rich people call themselves financially free. Here is an interesting reportfrom study conducted by Universty of Belgium, UK and Canada about Wealth and well being. Actually money makes you financially dependent. When you have more money, you become more dependent on it for everything and anything.
#4. Only men are up against Million dollar goal.
According to a report, nearly half of all millionaires are all women. There is no big difference among Men or women when it comes to making millions. Here is the listof women billionaires all over the world.
#5. You need to have Millionaire Mindset to be a Millionaire.
Not entirely true but it helps to reach the goal quicker. You can ask, What is millionaire mindset? It is explained in detail in the best selling book wrote by famous network marketer Bob Protector. He shows how an ordinary person can create his/her own economy by using their mind and thought process. You can read more at free ebook copy. I also found this ezinearticleto be more precise and short. To be short, it is about fine tuning your act and mind to decide your own the destiny and move towards as the only goal. I don't truely follow up them since I believe in my simple 3P strategy, Plan, Persist and Perseverance.
#6. I really need a Millionaire goal to be successful.
Not actually. It depends on each individual. Every individual is different in their own approach but many analyst recommend having a higher goal can lead to higher success rate. As I said earlier, success in life is different for each individual and it doesn't have to measured in dollars. Sometimes it is fun to track numbers and dollars to see the progress. But most of the time, it is about pride to say that you are one among list of High networth individual in this world.
Also tracking Many experts from their real life example, "What gets tracked, gets improved?" If you don't track your progress, you won't know where you were and where are you now. Tracking the progress is an important part for financial advancement.
#7. Everyone can't become a Millionaire.
Why not? If school drop outs like Bill gates, David Mudrock(Dole foods CEO) can do it, you can too. You don't need an MBA or doctor to be a Millionaire. Here is the list of all drop out millionaires, and here is one from forbes 2010 list of top ten drop outs.
If this makes you feel better and get you working on your Million dollar goal, go for it.
I have unrevealed some myths about millionaires, now you might ask how can easily become a millionaire?
It is actually a million dollar question and nobody has silver bullet answer for this question. If I had known the exact answer, I would have been a millionaire by now. Obviously, you cannot be a millionaire overnight unless two things happens, winning lottery or waking up with million dollar idea. There are "n" number of ways to become a high networth individual(over 1million).
A very conservative approach many banks suggest is to save a particular dollar amount from your early age like 21 every month and you can be a millionaire when you are 60 years old. It is also not set in stone because it depends on factors like saving rate and economical condition. But there are other ways like starting a new business, inventing some new product, work on multiple investment strategies etc.,
Just hook on to a strategy which works for you according to your comfort level and keep at it. Don't give up, just keep trying...
Image source: westLoh.com
I want to become a Millionaire...
Last blog post was an article from Trak.in about "India's Millionaires" and how the number got doubled last year even with all the economical uncertainity. I decided to continue the topic by writing about Millionaire Mindset and evaluating my own goal of becoming High Networth Individual (HNW).
I remember a funny saying, "You can easily get rich in two ways, by birth or by marriage." First one is obviously not in your hands but second option is feasible if you are confident about your people skills. But if you are a believer of yourself, there are better ways. Things took a new turn especially during the dot com era and people mentality started dreaming on high places. Thats the same timeframe when "Who wants to be a Millionaire?" show started airing and creating buzz all about becoming a millionaires. It surely boosted the moral of many individuals to aim big particularly many entreprenuers in the middle class.
Following the hit of the show and dot com era, many millionaires made news more often than ever and millionaires list started growing. According to the "World Wealth Report" which is a report on individuals with a net worth of at least $1 million in all assets except their primary residence. In the World Wealth Report 2007 - "The 11th annual World Wealth Report from Merrill Lynch/Capgemini finds the World’s High Net Worth (HNW) population growing to 9.5 million with their assets rising to $37.2 trillion.
Talk about becoming a Millionaire was everywhere in the internet. Many self made millionaires called themselves as gurus and grabbed the chance to preach their very own mantras via seminars and books. To name a few, Donald Trump, Robert Kiyosoki and more... But recently due to economy crash, investment values plummented and many millionaires dropped from the list. "The number of U.S. households with a net worth of $1 million or more, not including first homes, fell by 2.5 million to 6.7 million in 2008, according to the Spectrum Group report, as reported by Reuters. As of 2009, there were 2,886,200 HNWI's in United states.
Even after seeing the uncertainity of market, job losses and economy struggle, millionaire fire continues to live on among many brave souls. Whether I consider myself as a one among wannabe millionaires or it is just one of my goals, I strongly feel it is a challenging goal to have in your list. It is surely not a easy task for any one especially a guy like me who came from middle class indian family. But it is an achievable target for any hard working individual.
If there is a WILL, there is always a WAY to reach it. Whether you choose to work hard in your profession, spend less and save more or putting money on different invest vehicles or trying to invent new business ideas or products like iPhone or Joined MLM network, every route has got challenges and worth trying it out.
First thing I did was started tracking my progress by updating networth every month towards my goal to become millionaire in 2015. It really helps me to put things in perspective like where I was, where I am now, know periodic progress and what I need to do move forward in my journey.
Being a hardcore wannabe Millionaire, many times I asked myself number of questions like,
Is the Millionaire goal truely worth it?
Do I have to become a millionaire to live happily?
Why do you need to have Millionaire goal?
Can I have my Financial Freedom when I become Millionaire?
Does only men are up against Million dollar goal?
What is Millionaire Mindset?
Are Millionaires lavish spenders?
Are some things just myths about being a Millionaire or real truth? I plan to dwelve more into these questions in my next post. If you have any questions like above, please share your thoughts and views.
Do's and Don'ts when attending free seminars and Intro to Webinars!!
In last blog post, we talked about the real reason and importance to attend free seminars and workshops coming to your city. I hope most of your atleast convinced a bit and thinking about checking out few seminars which matches your interest. In this post, I am sharing some Do's and Don'ts while attending these seminars which keep you out of spending money.
Here are few do's and don't which I would recommend.
Do's
1. Go with an open mind to learn something new and ready to participate&share with others.
2. Take down notes of techniques, loop holes, hints, tips and useful ideas
3. Write down list of good websites which might be used during presentation.
4. Ask questions and get your doubts clarified for free.
5. Talk to the host after the meeting if you have further questions and pick their brain.
6. Try to talk to other attendees. Share, learn and create network which might help in future to create a power team of your own.
7. Note down the mileage and keep reciepts of any expenses like parking fee, lunch so you can account and claim.
8. Do take your friends or spouse only if they are interested in sitting with you and willing to learn. Otherwise you might have to leave in middle if they get bored and avoid feeling guilty.
Don'ts
1. Don't take your credit card or cheque book.
2. Stay away from signup and on't get tempted by their special and attractive offers.
3. You do not have to sit through the whole seminar. You will know when to call it quits if it doesn't seems to add any value to you.
These tips are some of many coming out of my experience and surely will help you prepared when you plan on attending seminars. If you have few others from your experience, please don't hesitate to share for the benefit of others.
Webinars
Alright!! We are surely in a internet age. Internet is name of the game. It makes our life easier every day in lot of different ways and getting educated is no exception. There are online universities which teaches classes and online seminars called webinars. SO if you don't have time to attend seminars physically, don't worry. Many financial institutions, brokerages firms and even rating agencies provide free webinars.
This is the new trend in the market these days. Webinars and webcast have become so easy for the organizers and also for attendees who don't have to get out of their house.
List of Free Events/Webinars
1. Rich Dad Education - Realestate seminars
2. Ray Lucia Retirement seminars
3. Free Stock investing seminar from TDAmeritrade, Scottrade, Charles Schwab, Moody's and more..
I strongly urge you try attending atleast one free seminar or workshop coming up in your city this summer and venture out. You will surely learn a trick or two. Don't forget to let me know how it went.
Why you should attend free seminars?
For many years, I never bothered to check the flyers and free entrance tickets offers to attend an investment or business seminar which came via postal mail. In 2004, when I was venturing out on different business options, I got 2 free tickets to attend an internet related seminar. It was all about internet marketing, SEO and ecommerce websites. Being a software professional, I was attracted and decided to check it out.
That changed everything. It was worth a attempt and was totally worth my time as well. I got exposed to some pretty neat stuff which I never knew as a techie guy. I learnt many new things about search engine optimization(SEO) techniques and other aspects on how to get high rank in search engine. Actually it was an eye opener for me. May be I could have learnt them all by reading few books but it might have taken me months. First of, I wouldn't have known where to start and wouldn't have experimented it. With the expertise I gained in that seminar, I did my research and implemented few SEO techniques in my websites and got pretty good results. That was just a half day seminar and I was amazed by the impact of the free crash course.
After that seminar, my perspective towards free seminars changed and I started to look closely on the free seminar offers before throwing it out to see whether it's worth few hours to gain something or not.
What are these Investment/Business seminars all about?
These half/one day seminars are hosted by different organization who are either investing institutions or teaching institutions hired by them. They arrange these seminar at big 3-4 star hotels in many big cities every month mostly from Spring till Fall season.

Their motivation behind is to attract people interested in business/investing ideas and peek interest by throwing attractive figures and numbers, hoping to lure you into 3-5 days workshops. Thats their ultimate goal to make money. They hope, if 50 people attend a session and atleast 20 signup, that would be enough to make profitable. Sometimes seminars are also conducted by wealth management firms and brokerage companies directly to explain their products and services.
Why should I go?
Are you an stock/bond investor or wannabe investor? Are you thinking about making some extra bucks by starting a new business or want to do something different?
If your answer is "Yes", you better start attending these free seminars matches your interest and goals. Think it's like a free crash course. It is so effective than reading books all day. Next question, you might ask whether it will be worth my time? I can assure you it will surely worth your time in long term. But only choose to go to seminars that matches your interest. If you been thinking about investing in stocks and funds, go and check out stock trading seminars. If you want to know more about real estate investing, attend seminars hosted by those type of organizations.
For example, "Rich Dad Poor Dad" author Robert Kiyoski started events to talk about real estate via his Rich Dad Education group. You can look out for their events at http://www.richdadeducation.com/
Gimme some or alteast 5 reasons to attend these seminars?
I can list down many reasons but there are the 5 importants reasons/advantages to attend these type of seminars.
1. Free Education
I won't say, you will learn everything. But you will surely learn some good and dirty tricks. You should be able to get some pointers and books which might help you to know where to start. You either pick up certain topic from the seminar and research more further to learn the intricacies which will surely help in your trade or future endeavors.
2. Learn new tricks
Even if you are Pro and knowledgeable in your field, you can still crab some funky tricks from these semianrs. I never knew a website called "Zillow.com" until I attended a real estate seminar. I got to know many great tricks and decent websites just by attending these seminars. I didn't know how real estate flipping or wholesale worked. Thanks to these seminars. Many seminars are hosted really with entertaining and well prepared materials to create interest among auidence to attract them to sign up. You will surely enjoy it.
3. Free Materials
You might be lucky enough to get some giveaways and free offers in these seminars. It is just worth to get these giveaways like CD's and books even if the seminar is not upto your expectation. One thing tough, try to take seating in front rows so you can hurry and crab these giveaways if offered.
4. Networking
These seminars provide a great ground to talk and network with like minded people. You may even end up learning and partnering with those who attend these seminars.
5. Tax Advantage
Last but not the lease, do you know you can write off the time spent and vehicle mileage to attend these seminars in your tax returns? Especially if you own a business or file self employment tax return, you can claim them under business expenses. This is really a good kick to top off all the pros in attending these seminars.
Hope these 5 reasons will convince you to attend these seminars and workshops. I will also talk more about the do's and don't in my next post and share some experience about the new trend in the seminar industry, Webinars and Webcasts. Watch out...
Source: Image from web.
Tax Planning - Stock Investment Strategies - II
In the last couple of posts, we been looking at how Tax planning can have an effect in your tax preparation. We saw the difference between Tax Planning and Tax preparation. We also started digging in deep on how the cost basis and stock selling strategy can save you some money. In the previous post, I started explaining about different types of determining cost basis and will complete in this post. At the end of this post, you will know which methods helps on different situations. So read on.
Check out the cost basis using FIFO method before moving on to read so you can better understand the difference.
Average cost is another method for determining cost basis and is only used with investment/mutual funds. To determine the average cost, the total cost of all shares purchased including any invested dividends is divided by the total number of shares held.
Once this method is used, it must be used each time the taxpayer sells shares in a mutual funds. This method is most effective if the shares purchased first have the lowest cost basis.
Average cost has 2 different ways of calculating according to the stock purchased periods. The single category method is when the investor takes all of the purchase amounts and divides by total number of shares owned. The double category method sorts the total shares owned into a short-term and a long-term holding period. Then, the average cost for each category is identified.
For example, Jan buys the Vanguard growth fund
-
200 shares on January 3, 2001 at $20/share
-
300 shares on September 5, 2002 at $25/share
-
200 shares on April 20, 2008 at $22/share
On Oct 15, 2009 she sold 500 shares at $20/share. What is her cost basis according to the average cost method?
According to the single category average cost method, she would take an average of the purchase prices and divide by the total number of shares owned:
-
200 shares at $20 = $4,000
-
300 shares at $25 = $7,500
-
200 shares at $22 = $4,400
-
Total cost = $15,900
-
Total shares = 700
-
Average cost per share = $22.71
So the gain/loss for this sale was:
-
500 shares ($20 – $22.71) = -$1135.50
Therefore, Jan had a net loss of = -$1135.50
The specific share identification method implies that specific shares are used to apply against the shares sold.
Before selling shares, the shareholder must inform the broker or fund company regarding which shares are to be sold. These instructions must be given at the time of sale or transfer, not later. The broker or agent must confirm this request within a reasonable time after the sale.
This method can be used effectively only if the shareholder has kept accurate records and has followed through on the receipt of confirmations from the broker. It allows the shareholder to control the capital gains taxes that he or she has to pay because this can be determined by selecting the shares to sell. You can tell your broker to sell your highest-cost shares when unloading part of your holdings in a stock. Using this "specific ID method" requires you to identify the shares to be sold by specifying their cost and purchase dates. You must also receive a written confirmation of your instructions from the broker or keep a record of your oral instructions. Put this in your tax file for safekeeping.
Which method is suitable and when?
Specific ID method is the best method for tax purposes because the investor has absolute control over how much the gain from a sale would be. Long term or short term gains can also be controlled. This is the preferred tax basis method for investors who actively manage their portfolio for tax efficiency. It is also not the most cost effective because of all of the effort that is required for proper record-keeping.
If you don't follow th procedure, you must use the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, meaning the shares you bought first are considered sold first. Those were likely the cheapest — giving you the biggest possible tax hit. The point to remember is that you must take action at the time of sale to use the specific ID method.
Short term Vs Long Term
If you have both unrealized gains and losses in your portfolio, but want to make some sales in a certain way matching them property to get the best effect. First, the general rule is try to sell long-term holdings (held over 12 months) first to benefit from the 15% maximum long-term capital gains rate. Then, unload your short-term holdings.
Then in order to offer offset those gains, you can sell the loser stocks for loss to balance it out. You will generally get the most tax-saving for the buck by selling short-term holdings for a short- term loss by taking advantage of short-term losses offsetting short-term gains which would otherwise be taxed at the regular income tax rate and any leftovers then offset long-term (15%) gains.
By following the above strategies matching your situation, you can either save some money by not paying to uncle sam way beyond the tax season. That concludes the tax planning - Stock investment strategy by doing cost basis analysis.
Tax Planning - Cost Basis and Investment Strategies - I
Previously, we discussed about the difference between Tax preparation and Tax planning. We saw few examples of simple tax planning strategies which can be adapted to save money. In continuing witth the tax planning topic, this post we will learn about Cost basis and stock selling strategies with examples that can help you either get more refunds or save paying more taxes.
What is Stock/Security Cost Basis?
There are actually various different cost basis involved in any investments including stocks. Let see the importance and their role in tax planning.
The Starting Cost basis is actually what a person pays for the purchase of the stock initially, adding any cost of purchase such as commissions. If the person received the stock as an inheritance, the starting basis is the value of the stock on the date the original owner died. This is called a stepped-up basis. Stepped basis is when the donee(who recieves the stocks) gets the FMV (fare market value) as their starting basis instead of donor's original basis.
If the stock is given as a gift, the starting basis is the lesser of either:
-
the starting basis of the person who gifted the stock(carryover basis), or
-
the market value of the stock on the date the gift.
Why cost basis important?
When you purchase/inherit/get gifts of stocks/securities, starting cost basis is set accordingly. When those stocks or other securities are sold, the selling price is usually different from the original purchase price of the shares. Either a capital gain or a capital loss is realized during this transaction and must be reported to the IRS by the taxpayer. In order to calculate the amount of capital gains and losses the cost basis of the stock must be determined.
Whether it is a short term or long term capital gain depends on the holding period of the stock/securities. We will discuss about that more later.
There are three different ways to find the cost basis when selling stocks:
-
First in first out (FIFO)
-
Average cost method
-
Specific share identification
First in first out (FIFO) method uses the shares first purchased as the cost basis. This method is effective if the first shares purchased were the most expensive.
The cost of shares is used in the order purchased for determining cost basis according to FIFO method. The oldest shares owed are considered to be the ones that are sold first. This method is the default method that the IRS will assume a taxpayer is following unless otherwise specified in a statement attached to the income tax return.
For example, Investor John buys the following round lots of Apple, Inc.:
- 200 shares on January 3, 1999 at $71.50/share
- 300 shares on September 5, 2007 at $160.50/share
- 200 shares on Apr 20, 2009 at $120.50/share
On September 15, 2010 she sold 400 shares at $200/share. What is her cost basis according to the FIFO method?
According to FIFO, she would exhaust the basis of the shares purchased the earliest first:
-
200 shares at $71.50
-
200 shares at $160.50
So the gain/loss for this sale was:
-
200 shares ($200 - $71.50) = $25,700
-
200 shares ($200 - $160.50) = $7,900
Net gain for the sale = $33,600.
Since all 400 shares were held over a year, the $33,600 gain would be subject to long-term capital gains taxes.
An example of basis in which a gift results in a gain would be as follows:
Ronald gives Jen a round lot of stock as a gift. Ronald paid $10,000 for the stock, and the fair market value (FMV) of the stock is $20,000 at the date of the gift. If Jen sells the stock for $20,000 she will use Ronald's starting basis of $10,000 is used to report the capital gain.
However, the example above does not apply if Ronald had gifted his stock to Jen when its FMV was $8,000, which is less than his original basis of $10,000. The capital gain or loss reported by Jen depends on whether she subsequently sells the stock for a gain or a loss.
Let's look another example in which the same gift could result in a loss:
If Jen sold the stock for $15,000 then Jennifer would report a capital gain of $5,000 using Ronald's original basis of $10,000 to calculate her gain. However, if Jen sold the stock for $5,000 she would report a loss of $3,000 using the stock's FMV basis of $8,000 to determine her loss. Note that if Jen sold the stock for $9,000 she would not report a gain or a loss in this situation.
Tax Planning Tips:
As per the FIFO method, first purchased stocks are used to calculate the cost basis. If they are purchased cheap, tax liability will be more and you will end up paying lot more in taxes. At the same time, if you are selling for loss, you might get big tax loss deduction. FIFO method is the default method used by any brokers unless you inform them to use different method for sell.
When it comes to gifting, tax planning should be key as well. What to gift, when to gift and how to gift them are important points. If you keep appreciated security and donee sells it immediately, he will end up liable for the big capital gain.
Interview with BizRadio the Money Man, Dan Frishberg
Houston MoneyFair 2009 is hosted by BizRadio 1110 AM, and I have with me Dan Frishberg, who is the man behind this network.
Dan, I’ve known about BizRadio for 3 or 4 years, but many Houstonians are not really aware of your network; let’s talk about BizRadio first, and then move on to the Money Fair.
Vijai: When and how did BizRadio actually evolve to become this very successful network?
Dan: We originally started in Houston radio on the old Business Radio 650. When then-owners CBS Infinity Broadcasting decided to eliminate the money format in Houston, my listeners were very vocal in their protests. I promised them I’d somehow continue my broadcasts, even if it meant starting my own radio station. In fact, many of those listeners literally became owners in the new company we formed, which we now know as BizRadio. It’s quite rare to see that kind of listener loyalty, but here we are.
Vijai: What was the main vision/motivation behind this radio network? Was it started to attract wealthy investors or to help people seeking financial literacy?
Dan: Depends what you call wealthy. Our audience is made up of people who take responsibility and know they must use their brains to survive and prosper in this very complex world. Some of them are rich, but many are rich people who haven’t received the money yet. They learn how to think rich, and they become rich.
What we don’t offer is invalid, anachronistic boilerplate financial planning ‘Pablum’. Such baloney has no value, and the proof of that lies in the fact that it has never helped create more rich people. BizRadio content is a little more demanding, but it actually makes people richer, by teaching them to think like rich people. There are tens of thousands of salesmen, young businessmen, homemakers, new and experienced investors who have learned to think like the successful people they wish to emulate.
The U.S. economy has changed dramatically, and the ideas behind successful investing from years gone by are no longer valid. There was a time when anyone with a few bucks to invest could grow that money by buying stocks and holding on to them - the companies were growing by leaps and bounds. This was especially true in the 80’s and 90’s – the years that saw tremendous growth in the technology industries. So yes, we do speak directly to what you refer to as ‘wealthy’ investors. (We like to think of them as ‘savvy’ investors.) On the other hand, we dedicate ourselves to financial literacy and the idea of initiating the uninitiated into the world of investing or “growing their money”. Education is a big part of our philosophy… education at many levels. But we consider all of our listeners as members of the union of people who use their brains “To Get a Better Deal”.
Vijai: If the intention is to educate people, I don't see any shows that target a normal or ordinary person. It all talks about high end investing, trading and so forth.
Dan: Actually, one of our hosts (Vince Rowe) is the president of the Online Trading Academy. It’s an excellent teaching facility. Del Walmsley is really a real estate investor, which brings a lot of listeners who aren’t so adept or interested in buying and selling stocks. Ray Lucia, who’s on mid-days in Houston, refers to himself as a financial ‘planner’… his investment material is about a variety of plans for long and short term investors. Today, ‘normal, ordinary’ people simply MUST face the fact that knowing what to do about your money means knowing how to plan for your future. Like it or not, even for ‘normal, ordinary’ people, gone are the days of hiding cash under the mattress. And again, it depends what you consider ordinary. We are probably not right for people who wish to STAY ordinary, but we appeal to people from all walks of life.
Vijai: What are a few shows you like to recommend to listeners -- apart from your MoneyMan Report at 4pm?
Dan: Wow, that’s a tough one. Let’s see…. OK, all of them!
Vijai: I know BizRadio has now expanded to Dallas, San Antonio and all over Colorado, etc. How do you feel about this accomplishment?
Dan: Well first of all, if I may, you’ve understated the reach of BizRadio. Many weeks, we have hundreds of thousands of our segments downloaded via podcasts by people all over the world. Our hosts are constantly invited to contribute on national and international TV, and people find us there – they search for us and become hooked via the internet.
Next, several new stations are in the process of signing up to take our programs through our syndicator, Global American. We’ve grown this company using the same principals we try to convey to our listeners in terms of how they should grow their business. We did what everyone should do… we found a niche that we’re very good at, and that no one else was doing very successfully, and we filled that niche. In fact, our audience is quite the niche audience. They’re the very cream of the crop, they know what they want out of life, and they’re not so vain as to believe they know everything about how to achieve their goals. They’re very willing to listen to what we have to say, and conversely, we get some great ideas from them. It’s a great audience.
Vijai: What about your BizRadio Academy -- what’s the goal behind this educational center?
Dan: Well, using your terminology, it’s to help turn normal or ‘ordinary’ people into ‘wealthy’ individuals. The whole educational center was built around a Basic Financial Literacy course, and the aforementioned Online Trading Academy.
Vijai: I know The MoneyFair is coming up at the end of this month. What else is online for the Houstonians?
Dan: I have to say that we plan our events, seminars, workshops, and classes around the immediate needs of our audience, which translates to keeping up with the changes in our economy and the flow of money. Sometimes that means we’ll plan an ‘emergency strategy session’, but typically, we have something going on, generally speaking, at least monthly. We have these events on a pretty regular basis.

Vijai: Now, moving on to The MoneyFair 2009. Tell me about it… is it a seminar or a workshop or a discussion forum?
Dan: It’s a full day of globally famous and successful financial celebrities, giants, icons – whatever you want to call them. It’ll be a combination seminar/carnival-of-the-brain, or any other metaphor you wish to use. It’ll certainly be the largest assembly of famous celebrities and innovators to arrive in Houston in years.
We’re particularly focused this year on the issue of globalization. The theme in fact is wrapped around the idea that economic borders around the world have fallen - and continue to fall every day. There’s no longer any such thing as a U.S. economy or a U.S. stock market. Things that are happening all over the world, especially in China and other Asians countries are affecting all of us much more than ever before. Some people have a tendency to want to worry about that. The truth is the doors have been opened to a vast world of opportunities. The Biz Radio 2009 Money Fair is about those opportunities and how to take advantage of them.
Vijai: Is this fair only for expert investors or novices who are just starting up investing?
Dan: I’m afraid that most of the real ‘expert’ investors will probably be on their yachts sipping adult beverages, or stretched out on any one of the world’s most beautiful white sand beaches. Let’s say there’s an ‘intermediate’ group that’s aiming to reach those levels… they’ll certainly be at the Money Fair. And I suspect that the “start-up investors” will be anxious to see what effect falling economic borders will have on them too. It’s for those who wish to opt in.
I have to say that your questions seem to betray a lack of respect for the average American that I just do not share. In fact, when we started, most media types predicted we’d be gone in six months. They believed there was no audience for such “targeted content.” The people continue to prove them wrong, and our audience continues to get richer.
Lots of our listeners have told me they avoided the recent crash, navigated successfully through the past several years, and they attribute their success to BizRadio. That’s about the best endorsement I could have hoped for.
Vijai: What can one expect from this MoneyFair?
Dan: You’ll see hundreds of Houstonians walking around in, somewhat in a state of rapture because of the pure enjoyment, stimulation and excitement to be had from being at a one-of- a kind event like this. There will also be plenty of education - which is not to be confused with free advice. Advice is a very scary thing in the world of money… you should only take it from your grandfather. But there will be lots and lots of free information. And I’m talking about the kind of information you can actually use to make your own decisions about your money.
Vijai: Money fair is advertised as free to register. As you know, nothing is free in America. What is the catch?
Dan: Sorry. It’s advertised as free - that means it’s free. Actually, if it weren’t for your driver’s license, you wouldn’t need your wallet at all. Feel free to leave your checkbook, your credit cards, and your skepticism at home. The only problem with the fact that it’s free is that when the seats are gone, they’re gone. We’re actually just about sold out now… if you hear it on the radio or TV later today, there may still be a few tickets available. Oh, I almost forgot. There IS a catch. You have to make reservations.
Vijai: Why is this event happening on a week day? Is it to avoid too much of a crowd or any particular reason?
It’s happening on a weekday because the only alternative is weekends. Don’t you play golf?
Vijai: What’s your final word to encourage people to attend the MoneyFair?
Seriously speaking - we’ve been at many crossroads to the future over these past few years, but none like the place where we are today. Yes, the economic borders are falling all around us, but if you look closely, you’ll find that the people of many, many nations are not hesitating at all. They’re opportunists. They saw what we Americans are able to do, and now many of them have learned to do it themselves… in some cases, they’re already doing it better than us. They came here to be educated, and then took those skills they learned home with them. They’ve become a force to be reckoned with. You know, there are about six billion people on the planet. Which means we’re now facing six billion competitors. But guess what? We also have six billion new opportunities. We’re going to dissect that thought thoroughly at this year’s Money Fair.
NOTHING IS TOO BIG TO FAIL - FINAL PART
In my last week blog post, Nothing is too big to fail - Part 1, I shared information about Citibank and CIT, biggest commercial lender. How these big companies are struggling in this tough economy? As I concluded, this week final part will have an another interesting story about Harvard facing hardship on its own. I did my conclusion with lesson learned from these stories. So Read on...
What's up with Harvard?
It is not just financial companies which are failing in this recession. Harvard University is facing what some say is the worst financial crisis of its 373-year history. While many of the nation's top universities are experiencing problems as a result of the financial meltdown — even Harvard University, which has the largest endowment of all universities by far. University's $37 billion endowment a year ago has shrunk to an estimated $26 billion today.
What got Harvard into so much trouble?
Harvard did what many Americans did: It overspent. In this decade, it's added 6.2 million square feet. That's roughly equal to the space occupied by the Pentagon. These land acquisitions have cost Harvard more than $4 billion. It has had huge expenses built up while the number of students stayed constant.
"It's rather like someone who has taken on a mortgage, bought a house that far exceeds what it can afford, and they're now facing really what is the worst, most dangerous financial crisis in their 373-year history," according to Nina Munk, contributing editor at Vanity Fair, told NPR's Linda Wertheimer. To read the article, goto npr.org
Should big Companies allowed to fail?
Thats a very hard question even to Bernake. Being a big shark in a ocean is not an easy task. Playing a big role in the economy doesn't protect against economy downfall. I see it as a double edge sword. A company has to take chances and risk by investing their money in order to make more money. If it avoids taking risk or chances, consumers won't see new products and services at the same time company cannot grow and make money.
On other hand, if economy is falling because of companies fault and bad practicies, it does needs to be regulated and corrected. At the same time, If these companies are penalized by allowing to fail for taking risk to grow is not the right way. But I agree a company should act and forecast before stepping into risky modes of operation.
So if these companies are always left to fail, there is a bigger chance of snowball or avalanche effect which is actually averted by Fed last year. Taking last years episode, if every big banks which faced problems are let to fail without bail out, just imagine the impact it would have created. It would have devastating effect twice worse than great depression. It is not prudent to always struggling company to fail. Everybody needs a lending hand sometimes and more so during bad times.
Obviously, it is really hard to say which companies should be allowed fail and not others. It all depends on the time and position. I hope that also answers the question, Why financial institution gets billions to when big GM and Chyrsler are allowed to fail. Check out these articles related to this story from SeekingAlpha and npr.org.
Lesson Learned
I am fully convinced that no company is too big to fail and government won't always come for help. So if you are investing in securities and bonds, please be cautions and invest in right company analysing their porfolio and performance. Don't by stocks just because the company is too big and it will never will fail. As we all know now, NO COMPANY IS TOO BIG TO FAIL.
NOTHING IS TOO BIG TO FAIL - PART I
Last year, I posted a blog titled CITIBANK, TOO BIG TO FAIL and it has been almost 9 months now. During this interim period, we have seen lot more companies face tough battles, some went under and some survived. Even Citibank came very close to be taken over by FDIC. With the help of US government and many other investors, it still stands as big financial company.
These past experiences changed a lot and made many analyst to rethink, "Is there anything TOO BIG TO FAIL?". After seeing many big banks, financial institution, auto companies crumble like pack of cards, the statement doesn't hold value anymore.
During a town hall meeting on Jul 27th, Fed chairman Bernake said, "The problem we have is that in a financial crisis if you let the big firms collapse in a disorderly way, they'll bring down the whole system. When the elephant falls down, all the grass gets crushed as well," Bernanke added. He said he had to "hold his nose" to rescue such institutions during this crisis. As a result, Bernanke said it was his "top priority" to fix the issue of too-big-to-fail. As per him, there is nothing like a company is too big to fail. It just needs to fail graciously without affecting others. To read the full article, go to marketwatch.com
Citibank - Status quo?
Currently Citibank has it's hands tied with U.S. government holding 40% stake(common stocks) after recieving giving $45 billion in bailout money. Vikram Pandit, CEO who took over his job at tough times is still hanging in there when many big companies vanished from the scenes. He is surviving with big hope to bring the company to his pride. Meanwhile he is named as one of the worst CEO by analyst and government is closely watching every one of his actions.
In an interview, Vikram pandit was chocked by questions which he struggled to answer. For a question, When will this crisis be over? Do you see any signs, at this point, of a recovery?
VP: What you have to understand is that, this is a significant shock to the world economy. Just think about it, when you look at the last 5, 10 years there were two engines of growth. There was the U.S. consumer and credit creation. None of those are likely to be the engines of growth going forward. The world's looking for a new business model. It's about new engines of growth and it's not only about creating stability and saying that we're out of the crisis mode. But we all have work to do as we search for what the new business model is for the world. I am optimistic about the signs that we're seeing, suggesting that stability is arriving.
He seems to be optimistic, that is what he can do right! Click to check out the full interview. It is hard to say, the worst is over for Citibank. Citibank is under close scrutinty and they cannot make any drastic moves without their Fed's approval. Even today(Aug 8/13/2009), they need goverment approval to pay bonuses and rasies for their energy trader who clinched millions for the company. It is going to take lot of work and patience to get out of the mess. We have to wait and watch.
Big CIT Story
This summer another big financial failure caught everybody attention without much shocking. CIT, a commercial lending institution struggling to get out trouble even after getting $2B bail out money from the government. I am sure many never heard of this company. I only heard when it showed up in the news. CIT serves as short-term financier to about 2,000 vendors that supply merchandise to 300,000 stores, according to the National Retail Federation. Analysts say 60 percent of the apparel industry depends on CIT for financing, so other lenders taking up all the slack would pose a big financial strain.
CIT has been scrambling to raise $2 billion to $4 billion after the federal government refused to bail out the company. On Jul 19th, major bondholders to keep the company out of bankruptcy with a $3 billion rescue loan, the New York Times reported. Under the deal, CIT's main bondholders would give the company $3 billion at an initial rate of 10.5 percent, the Times reported.
A bankruptcy filing would have threatened funding for scores of small businesses across the country. It also would have wiped out $2.3 billion in federal bailout money injected into the company in December.
Right now, CIT seems to be working on many restructuring plans. The Federal Reserve put the company through its "stress test" last week and found it faced a $4 billion capital shortfall. It also suspended the dividends. Suspending the dividends on four series of preferred stock will improve liquidity and preserve capital during its restructuring, CIT said. The company also reaffirmed that it has received enough offers to complete a debt repurchase program.
There is more to come in the next week blog with final analysis and conclusion on a controversial question, "Should big companies be allowed to fail?" and Lesson learned from this crisis. Watch out...
Content sources - marketwatch.com and npr.org
Cash for Clunkers Program - Is it really helping?
Recent days, I see one among three cars on the road are either new or almost new, waiting to get their new license plate. Thanks to the CARS program putting more fuel efficient cars on the road taking out gas guzzlers but no thanks. It seems to be the talk of all news channels and the most popular stimulus package of all in recent months.
It has become so popular, it even ran out money so fast in couple of weeks of its announcement and waiting for approval to get more funds almost two billion to jump start again. While it is on hold in process to get more money, we take time to analyze,
Is the program really helps the consumer, economy and enviroment as it supposed to?
It is a $64 question. I tried to do my investigation as usual from many information loaded internet websites.
Quick Overview of CARS program
Cash for Clunkers program also known as The CAR Allowance Rebate System (CARS) is a $1 billion government program that helps consumers buy or lease a more environmentally-friendly vehicle from a participating dealer when they trade in a less fuel-efficient car or truck. The program is designed to energize the economy; boost auto sales and put safer, cleaner and more fuel-efficient vehicles on the nation's roadways.
Is it helping the consumer?
Answer to the question is, Yes and No. Consumers will be able to take advantage of this program and receive a $3,500 or $4,500 discount from the car dealer when they trade in their old vehicle and purchase or lease a new one. Consumers do not need to register anywhere or at anytime for this program. However, to find out eligibility requirements click here and also check another website http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.com/ for more info on this program.
By giving the cash credit to auto buyers while trading in their gas guzzlers, it is free money and helps the consumer. But it is again putting the consumer to debt and adding their debt load. Many consumers who can't even afford to buy a new car at tough time. They just want to get the cash credit and blinding buying without realizing they need to pay back the rest of their auto loan which not even tax deductabile. It was similar to the situation people bought big houses when they can't afford mortgage payment. It not helping any middle class who are suffering from loss of jobs instead adding their burden by teasing them with free money.
So please don't go rushing to get a new car if you can't even afford to make car payments says Houston chronicle sharon buggs. She also says, if you can pay all cash for the vehicle after the cash credit and other incentives are applied, then you can afford to buy a new car. Also if your take-home pay can absorb a monthly car payment — and you are not in jeopardy for losing your income stream because of a layoff — then you can afford to finance the purchase of a new car. Check out some tips from her at Houston chronicle.
Is it atleast guzzling the economy?
Not really. It is only helping one industry which is Auto. It is also in a way boosting customer confidence with money flowing between consumer, banks and manufacturers. Thats a good thing. Banks and Auto dealers are writing off loans and loosening the credit crunch a bit.
It sure helping auto makers like Ford, Toyota who is selling more cars compared to last year. The program helped lift Ford Motor Co. to its first monthly sales increase in two years, the company's top sales analyst said Sunday. July sales results mark the first year-over-year gain for Ford since November 2007 and apparently the first uptick by any of the six biggest carmakers since last August, Ford sales analyst George Pipas said. Check npr.org for more info.
OK! What about reducing carbon residues?
Not exactly! I know it is meant to take out gas guzzlers out of the road help which eventually help reduce gas consumption but it doesn't affect lot on reducing carbon residue. According to npr's report, an analyst calculates that if you trade in an 18 mpg clunker for a 22 mpg new car (22 miles per gallon is the minimum mileage allowed for a new car under the program), it would take five and a half years of typical driving to offset the new car's carbon footprint. With trucks, it might take eight or nine years.
Of course, the bigger the mileage improvement from your old car to the new one, the more gas you save and the faster you work off the new car's carbon footprint. If you trade in a 20 mpg car for a Prius that gets about 48 mpg, it saves so much gas that you can offset the Prius' footprint in about a year and a half. (But a 20 mpg car doesn't qualify as a clunker, so there's no government voucher).
Analyst don't see a direct or immediate impact on the reduction of carbon residues by this program but it does help in the long run. It also takes whole lot of cars to be taken out of the road to really make a difference. Check out another npr.org report, "Clunkers" program isn't really green.
Bottom line, in all aspect, I don't see a real value to this CARS program. Also is it worth saying the program is success just by merely from the billions running out? It neither nurtures the consumer personal finance status nor the environment. I only has shorter impact to the economy especially to auto industry. At this time of recession, when the unemployment rate is very high and people are struggling to feed their family, we need better program with greater impact. This program only helps smaller portion of people who either has good job or good bank account or credit to spend for their new car.
Thats my take and I am sticking to it.
Photo source: http://www.cristyli.com/
Delicious
Newsvine
Furl
Google
Yahoo
Technorati




Recent comments
3 days 20 hours ago
4 days 4 hours ago
22 weeks 4 days ago
23 weeks 4 days ago
24 weeks 4 days ago
25 weeks 1 day ago
25 weeks 1 day ago
1 year 23 weeks ago
1 year 24 weeks ago
1 year 29 weeks ago